@article{CJCR3073,
author = {Gil-Su Jang and Min-Jeong Kim and Hong-Il Ha and Jung Han Kim and Hyeong Su Kim and Sung Bae Ju and Dae Young Zang},
title = {Comparison of RECIST version 1.0 and 1.1 in assessment of tumor response by computed tomography in advanced gastric cancer},
journal = {Chinese Journal of Cancer Research},
volume = {25},
number = {6},
year = {2013},
keywords = {},
abstract = {Objective: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline version 1.0 (RECIST 1.0) was proposed as a new guideline for evaluating tumor response and has been widely accepted as a standardized measure. With a number of issues being raised on RECIST 1.0, however, a revised RECIST guideline version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) was proposed by the RECIST Working Group in 2009. This study was conducted to compare CT tumor response based on RECIST 1.1 vs. RECIST 1.0 in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).
Methods: We reviewed 61 AGC patients with measurable diseases by RECIST 1.0 who were enrolled in other clinical trials between 2008 and 2010. These patients were retrospectively re-analyzed to determine the concordance between the two response criteria using the κ statistic.
Results: The number and sum of tumor diameters of the target lesions by RECIST 1.1 were significantly lower than those by RECIST 1.0 (P},
issn = {1993-0631}, url = {https://cjcr.amegroups.org/article/view/3073}
}